Barry Ritholz destroys the myth that the market hates uncertainty:
A closer look at this uncertainty meme reveals it to be a false-ism — one of those emotionally appealing phrases that ping around trading desks. The lack of evidence supporting their premise seems to matter very little.
To recognize how meaningless these statements are, consider the opposite: Could markets function without uncertainty? It takes only a little thought to realize that markets actually thrive on doubt, imperfect information and a lack of consensus.
Uncertainty drives the market’s price-discovery mechanism. Investing requires there to be differences of opinion. When there is broad agreement as to an asset’s fair value, trading volume falls. Without any uncertainty, who would take the opposite side of your trade?
History teaches that whenever the opposite occurs — when certainty overwhelms uncertainty — the herd tends to be wrong. In rare instances, when there is a near-total lack of uncertainty in the market, the outcome is usually a spectacular disaster.
Read the whole thing as it is very worthwhile. Ritholz is surely right; it is the times of market certainty – such as right now as a matter of fact – that bother me the most. Right now, investors seem quite sure of a few things:
- Emerging markets: Everybody seems to want to own or wants to tell the CNBC audience that they already own and you should too, something emerging markets. Stocks, bonds; doesn’t matter as long as it can be called emerging markets. The emerging, emerging markets are even sexier.
- Bonds: Government bond funds are the safe and sure bets.
- The US Dollar: The US dollar is doomed and on a one way trip to palookaville.
- Commodities: Because of 3 above, the dollar price of all commodities must rise.
- Quantitative Easing: QE II will proceed as expected and on schedule.
There are reasons why things might not go as expected but these are just guesses:
- Emerging markets: These economies are hot because US monetary policy is causing capital inflows. Their governments are trying to limit inflows through various methods but are mostly unsuccessful. Many of these countries are experiencing inflationary booms. When the inflows stop, so will the booms. When and why that happens, I don’t know.
- Bonds: Long term government bond yields have already started to rise. Assuming QE II is successful in raising inflation expectations, that is not compatible with lower bond yields (higher bond prices). Bond buyers may be irrational but higher inflation will open their eyes.
- The US Dollar: It is obvious that the Obama administration, like the Bush administration, wants a lower dollar. That doesn’t mean they’ll get it. Maybe higher bond yields attracts capital back to the US. Maybe the politicians get their act together and actually enact some decent economic policy. Hey, it’s a long shot but not impossible.
- Commodities: If the dollar doesn’t fall, a lot of money will come out of commodities because that’s the only reason it’s there.
- Quantitative Easing: I’m not convinced it will do anything for real growth even in the short term. The more likely outcome would seem to be inflation of commodity prices. At what point will the Fed pull the plug on QE II? Oil at $100? At what oil price does the drag of higher oil prices put us right back in recession? What does the Fed do then?
QE II has inspired the meme that all asset prices must rise because the dollar must fall and so far that has been a good bet. It isn’t that simple people.




Mike P.F.
November 10, 2010 at 12:14 pm“Emerging markets: These economies are hot because US monetary policy is causing capital inflows. Their governments are trying to limit inflows through various methods but are mostly unsuccessful. Many of these countries are experiencing inflationary booms. When the inflows stop, so will the booms. When and why that happens, I don’t know.”
When we and Western Europe start growing more quickly again, that is EXACTLY what will happen. There is no ifs,maybes, or mights, here.
Joseph Y. Calhoun, III
November 10, 2010 at 4:51 pmMike,
It could be from higher growth here attracting capital back or for some other reason. I don’t know but it is going to surprise the hell out of some people when it does.
Mike P.F.
November 10, 2010 at 6:38 pmWell, I’m kinda just waiting for this to happen. I wonder if it will happen at the same time China’s housing bubble bursts.
Dterry
November 10, 2010 at 11:50 pmHere’s my take on uncertainty v certainty or from my perspective dynamic v static markets. The issue as it was during the low interest rate era just after the dot com burst and 9/11, is one of inefficient markets. You have players in the market such as central banks and investment houses (investment banks have become large market participants since the end of Glass-Steagall) that because of the open discount window, QE etc are giant players especially relative to the average investor. Some of the herd mentality can be thought of as actual collusion, the investment houses have the resources to put markets where they want. This is similar to what we saw in the MBS scenario just passed. I would bet that volatility remains slightly elevated as to a certain extent, these guys hedge their bets.
My gut tells me that when we reach the ultimate level, or when the bullies have pushed the market to their desired level, which by the way I still think is further, we will have extreme media banter about the ridiculous levels of assets. Though some pessimistic questioners are quacking about gold and warning about China, I don’t feel the extreme questioning we heard as oil went past $140/bbl a few years earlier. The investment houses may try to short volatility in the short dated maturities and keep the markets static in order to profit further. The longer term volatility will hold relatively firm as eventually the static market will break and it will be a rush for cover.
The hedge funds got burned on this as they naively thought the markets were in an efficient state 3 years ago and started getting margin calls as the markets went haywire.
In conclusion the markets may just be less efficient than we are taught to believed.
Dterry
November 10, 2010 at 11:53 pmAnd can remain irrational longer than we are taught to believe.